Skip to content
MN Comp BuddyBuilt by Dan Swenson, Robert Wilson & Associates

Can I Be Fired for Filing a Workers' Comp Claim in Minnesota?

You can lose a job while on workers' comp, but firing someone because they filed a claim is illegal retaliation under Minn. Stat. 176.82. What the law says and what you can do.

By Daniel Swenson, Minnesota workers' compensation attorney, Robert Wilson & AssociatesUpdated Reviewed

Yes, you can be fired while you're on workers' comp in Minnesota. What your employer cannot do is fire you because you filed the claim.

Minnesota is an at-will employment state, so an employer can generally let someone go for any reason or no reason. The exception is Minn. Stat. § 176.82, which makes it illegal to fire, threaten, or discriminate against an employee because that employee filed a workers' comp claim or exercised rights under the Workers' Compensation Act. Whether a firing was legal almost always comes down to the real reason behind it.

At-will employment and the retaliation law

At-will employment means your employer does not need good cause to fire you. They can lay you off, restructure your position, or terminate you for poor performance, even while you're on workers' comp.

The retaliation law means they cannot do any of that because of your claim. Courts look at the whole picture to find the real reason. If you filed a claim on Monday and were fired on Tuesday with no prior performance issues, a judge is going to look hard at that timing.

What the statute says

Minn. Stat. § 176.82, subd. 1 provides:

Any person who discharges or threatens to discharge, or who intentionally obstructs or intentionally hinders, an employee who seeks workers' compensation benefits or who has exercised any right under Chapter 176 is guilty of a misdemeanor and may be sentenced accordingly.

The statute also creates a civil claim. Under subdivision 2, an employee who was discharged or discriminated against in violation of the statute can sue for reinstatement to the same or an equivalent position, back pay for the wages lost between discharge and reinstatement, restoration of benefits, and reasonable attorney fees. That claim is separate from the workers' comp system itself and carries its own damages.

What counts as retaliation

Retaliation covers more than an outright firing. Under the statute and the case law, it includes termination after filing a claim or returning from a work injury, refusal to rehire a former employee because of a prior claim, a demotion or cut in hours tied to the claim, threats like "if you file a claim, you won't have a job to come back to," hostile treatment meant to pressure someone into dropping a claim or never filing one, and constructive discharge, which means making conditions so intolerable that a reasonable person would quit.

The common thread is causation. The employer acted because you exercised your workers' comp rights.

How these cases are proven

Employers rarely say out loud that a firing was about the claim, so retaliation is usually proven with circumstantial evidence. Courts look at how close the firing came to the claim filing, the injury report, or the return-to-work date. They ask whether the stated reason holds up, like "poor performance" from an employee who had good reviews until the injury. They compare how other employees with similar issues were treated, weigh any supervisor comments about the claim or the restrictions, and look for a pattern of firings after other employees filed claims.

No single factor decides the case, but timing, a reason that doesn't hold up, and different treatment of similar workers can add up to a strong one.

How FMLA and the ADA fit in

Workers' comp, the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) are separate laws that often apply to the same injury.

If you qualify for FMLA (you've worked for the employer at least 12 months, worked at least 1,250 hours, and the employer has 50 or more employees within 75 miles), your employer must hold your job or an equivalent one for up to 12 weeks of leave in a 12-month period. FMLA leave can run at the same time as workers' comp leave, and employers usually designate it that way. That is normal. Once the 12 weeks are used up, the duty to hold the position changes, but the retaliation law under § 176.82 still applies.

If your work injury leaves you with a disability as the ADA defines it, your employer may have to provide a reasonable accommodation, such as modified duties, schedule changes, or reassignment to an open position. That duty continues after FMLA leave runs out, and an employer cannot refuse an accommodation just because the disability came from a work injury.

Put together, the layers work like this. The retaliation law applies from the day you file. FMLA protects the job itself for up to 12 weeks. When FMLA runs out and you still cannot return, the employer must consider ADA accommodation before terminating. Through all of it, the employer cannot fire you because of the comp claim. How each layer applies depends on the facts of your case.

Return-to-work duties on both sides

Under Minn. Stat. § 176.101, the employer has a duty to offer suitable work within your restrictions if it's available, and you have a duty to accept suitable work within your restrictions.

If your employer eliminates your position while you're out and later claims you "refused to return to work," the facts about what was actually offered, and whether it fit your restrictions, become the whole case.

If you think you were fired over the claim

  1. Save everything: emails, texts, performance reviews, and any written communication about the termination.
  2. Write down the timeline: when you reported the injury, when you filed the claim, and when you were terminated.
  3. Get the stated reason in writing. If it was given verbally, follow up in writing: "I want to confirm you said I was terminated because of [reason]. Is that correct?"
  4. Do not sign a severance agreement without having it reviewed by an attorney. Severance agreements often release all claims, including retaliation claims.
  5. Move quickly. Retaliation claims under Minn. Stat. § 176.82 have their own procedural requirements, and timing matters.
  6. Apply for unemployment. A retaliation claim and an unemployment claim are separate, so apply for unemployment benefits promptly.

A few things hurt these cases. Don't assume at-will means you have no claim, because at-will is not a license to retaliate. Don't wait, because evidence gets stale and witnesses forget. Don't post about it on social media, since anything you post can be used against you in proceedings. And don't hand the employer an after-the-fact reason for the firing by taking company property or sending angry emails.

This page explains the law, not your case. Questions about your own firing belong with an attorney.

Statutes referenced

Related guides

Tools for this part of your claim

Use the tools that fit the issue you just read about. They are free, require no login, and keep your entries on your device.